Horfield vs Murchison
Property investment comparison - Horfield, VIC 3567 vs Murchison, VIC 3610
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Horfield wins 1, Murchison wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Horfield | Murchison |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $430K | $425K |
| Median unit price | - | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 5.29% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 7.79% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +7.7%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 2.2% | 3.7% |
| Population | 93 | 884 |
Horfield vs Murchison: what the numbers say
The median house price is $430K in Horfield and $425K in Murchison, so Murchison is the cheaper entry point, with Horfield houses about 1% dearer.
Rental vacancy is 2.2% in Horfield and 3.7% in Murchison, so landlords in Horfield face less competition for tenants.
Murchison is the bigger suburb, with a population of 884 against 93, roughly 10 times the size of Horfield; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Murchison for a lower purchase price, Horfield for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison