Horsham vs Mincha West
Property investment comparison - Horsham, VIC 3400 vs Mincha West, VIC 3568
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Horsham wins 3, Mincha West wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Horsham | Mincha West |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $475K | $480K |
| Median unit price | $400K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 5.00% | 4.23% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.10% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +18.1% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +17.5% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.1% | 3.1% |
| Population | 15,134 | 16 |
Horsham vs Mincha West: what the numbers say
The median house price is $475K in Horsham and $480K in Mincha West, so Horsham is the cheaper entry point, with Mincha West houses about 1% dearer.
On cash flow, Horsham leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.00%, compared with 4.23% in Mincha West, a gap of 0.77 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.1% in Horsham and 3.1% in Mincha West, so landlords in Horsham face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Horsham is the bigger suburb, with a population of 15,134 against 16, roughly 946 times the size of Mincha West; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Horsham for rental income, Horsham for a lower purchase price, Horsham for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison