Horsham vs Pompapiel
Property investment comparison - Horsham, VIC 3400 vs Pompapiel, VIC 3571
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Horsham wins 1, Pompapiel wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Horsham | Pompapiel |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $475K | $470K |
| Median unit price | $400K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 5.00% | 3.58% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.10% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +18.1% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +17.5% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.1% | - |
| Population | 15,134 | 38 |
Horsham vs Pompapiel: what the numbers say
The median house price is $475K in Horsham and $470K in Pompapiel, so Pompapiel is the cheaper entry point, with Horsham houses about 1% dearer.
On cash flow, Horsham leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.00%, compared with 3.58% in Pompapiel, a gap of 1.42 percentage points.
Horsham is the bigger suburb, with a population of 15,134 against 38, roughly 398 times the size of Pompapiel; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Horsham for rental income, Pompapiel for a lower purchase price. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison