Hotham Heights vs Montrose
Property investment comparison - Hotham Heights, VIC 3741 vs Montrose, VIC 3765
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Hotham Heights wins 3, Montrose wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Hotham Heights | Montrose |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $970K | $980K |
| Median unit price | $195K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 3.63% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.70% | 3.52% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +2.9% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +15.8% |
| Vacancy rate | 0.2% | 0.3% |
| Population | 128 | 6,900 |
Hotham Heights vs Montrose: what the numbers say
The median house price is $970K in Hotham Heights and $980K in Montrose, so Hotham Heights is the cheaper entry point, with Montrose houses about 1% dearer.
Rental vacancy is 0.2% in Hotham Heights and 0.3% in Montrose, so landlords in Hotham Heights face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Montrose is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,900 against 128, roughly 54 times the size of Hotham Heights; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Hotham Heights for a lower purchase price, Hotham Heights for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Full profile
Hotham Heights, VIC 3741
Open Hotham Heights suburb profileRecent sales in Hotham Heights
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison