Skip to main content

Howlong vs Murringo

Property investment comparison - Howlong, NSW 2643 vs Murringo, NSW 2586

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Howlong wins 4, Murringo wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricHowlongMurringo
Median house price$595K$590K
Median unit price-$420K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.44%3.97%
Gross rental yield (units)5.00%3.87%
1-year house growth+6.3%-13.3%
3-year house growth+29.7%-
Vacancy rate1.4%6.2%
Population2,997390

Howlong vs Murringo: what the numbers say

The median house price is $595K in Howlong and $590K in Murringo, so Murringo is the cheaper entry point, with Howlong houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Howlong leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.44%, compared with 3.97% in Murringo, a gap of 0.47 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +6.3% in Howlong and -13.3% in Murringo, so recent momentum favours Howlong, while Murringo went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Howlong and 6.2% in Murringo, so landlords in Howlong face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Howlong is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,997 against 390, roughly 8 times the size of Murringo; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Howlong for rental income, Murringo for a lower purchase price, Howlong for recent price momentum, Howlong for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison