Howlong vs Wattle
Property investment comparison - Howlong, NSW 2643 vs Wattle, NSW 2795
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Howlong wins 2, Wattle wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Howlong | Wattle |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $595K | $600K |
| Median unit price | - | $450K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.44% | 4.43% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.00% | 5.34% |
| 1-year house growth | +6.3% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +29.7% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.4% | 0.8% |
| Population | 2,997 | 12,169 |
Howlong vs Wattle: what the numbers say
The median house price is $595K in Howlong and $600K in Wattle, so Howlong is the cheaper entry point, with Wattle houses about 1% dearer.
Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 4.44% in Howlong and 4.43% in Wattle, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.
Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Wattle and 1.4% in Howlong, so landlords in Wattle face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Wattle is the bigger suburb, with a population of 12,169 against 2,997, roughly 4.1 times the size of Howlong; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Howlong for a lower purchase price, Wattle for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison