Skip to main content

Hoxton Park vs Tweed Heads South

Property investment comparison - Hoxton Park, NSW 2171 vs Tweed Heads South, NSW 2486

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Hoxton Park wins 1, Tweed Heads South wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricHoxton ParkTweed Heads South
Median house price$1.2M$1.2M
Median unit price-$835K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.99%3.83%
Gross rental yield (units)4.19%4.85%
1-year house growth+7.6%estimate+7.3%
3-year house growth-+29.3%
Vacancy rate2.2%0.6%
Population4,5727,941

Hoxton Park vs Tweed Heads South: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.2M in Hoxton Park and $1.2M in Tweed Heads South.

On cash flow, Tweed Heads South leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.83%, compared with 2.99% in Hoxton Park, a gap of 0.84 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +7.6% in Hoxton Park (an estimate) and +7.3% in Tweed Heads South, so recent momentum favours Hoxton Park, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Tweed Heads South and 2.2% in Hoxton Park, so landlords in Tweed Heads South face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Tweed Heads South is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,941 against 4,572, larger than Hoxton Park; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Tweed Heads South for rental income, Hoxton Park for recent price momentum, Tweed Heads South for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison