Skip to main content

Hughesdale vs South Melbourne

Property investment comparison - Hughesdale, VIC 3166 vs South Melbourne, VIC 3205

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Hughesdale wins 1, South Melbourne wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricHughesdaleSouth Melbourne
Median house price$1.6M$1.6M
Median unit price$725K$600K
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.09%
Gross rental yield (units)4.80%5.90%
1-year house growth-4.6%+0.4%estimate
3-year house growth+12.0%-
Vacancy rate1.7%1.2%
Population7,56311,548

Hughesdale vs South Melbourne: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.6M in Hughesdale and $1.6M in South Melbourne, so Hughesdale is the cheaper entry point, with South Melbourne houses about 2% dearer.

For units, Hughesdale sits at a median of $725K against $600K in South Melbourne, which makes South Melbourne the more affordable unit market and Hughesdale the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved -4.6% in Hughesdale and +0.4% in South Melbourne (an estimate), so recent momentum favours South Melbourne, while Hughesdale went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 1.2% in South Melbourne and 1.7% in Hughesdale, so landlords in South Melbourne face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

South Melbourne is the bigger suburb, with a population of 11,548 against 7,563, larger than Hughesdale; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Hughesdale for a lower purchase price, South Melbourne for recent price momentum, South Melbourne for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison