Skip to main content

Huntingdon vs Singleton

Property investment comparison - Huntingdon, NSW 2446 vs Singleton, NSW 2330

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Huntingdon wins 2, Singleton wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricHuntingdonSingleton
Median house price$710K$715K
Median unit price$510K$430K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.99%4.61%
Gross rental yield (units)4.70%-
1-year house growth-+8.8%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.5%0.8%
Population865,185

Huntingdon vs Singleton: what the numbers say

The median house price is $710K in Huntingdon and $715K in Singleton, so Huntingdon is the cheaper entry point, with Singleton houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Huntingdon sits at a median of $510K against $430K in Singleton, which makes Singleton the more affordable unit market and Huntingdon the pricier one.

On cash flow, Huntingdon leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.99%, compared with 4.61% in Singleton, a gap of 0.38 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Singleton and 1.5% in Huntingdon, so landlords in Singleton face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Singleton is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,185 against 86, roughly 60 times the size of Huntingdon; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Huntingdon for rental income, Huntingdon for a lower purchase price, Singleton for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison