Skip to main content

Huntly North vs Rye

Property investment comparison - Huntly North, VIC 3551 vs Rye, VIC 3941

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Huntly North wins 3, Rye wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricHuntly NorthRye
Median house price$945K$950K
Median unit price$495K$585K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.12%3.38%
Gross rental yield (units)5.37%4.50%
1-year house growth--5.1%
3-year house growth--15.5%
Vacancy rate4.4%1.7%
Population469,438

Huntly North vs Rye: what the numbers say

The median house price is $945K in Huntly North and $950K in Rye, so Huntly North is the cheaper entry point, with Rye houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Huntly North sits at a median of $495K against $585K in Rye, which makes Huntly North the more affordable unit market and Rye the pricier one.

On cash flow, Rye leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.38%, compared with 3.12% in Huntly North, a gap of 0.26 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.7% in Rye and 4.4% in Huntly North, so landlords in Rye face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Rye is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,438 against 46, roughly 205 times the size of Huntly North; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Rye for rental income, Huntly North for a lower purchase price, Rye for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison