Skip to main content

Hurlstone Park vs Narraweena

Property investment comparison - Hurlstone Park, NSW 2193 vs Narraweena, NSW 2099

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Hurlstone Park wins 2, Narraweena wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricHurlstone ParkNarraweena
Median house price$2.5M$2.5M
Median unit price$845K-
Gross rental yield (houses)2.22%2.54%
Gross rental yield (units)4.25%3.86%
1-year house growth+7.5%estimate+3.2%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate0.9%0.8%
Population5,0016,971

Hurlstone Park vs Narraweena: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.5M in Hurlstone Park and $2.5M in Narraweena, so Narraweena is the cheaper entry point.

On cash flow, Narraweena leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.54%, compared with 2.22% in Hurlstone Park, a gap of 0.32 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +7.5% in Hurlstone Park (an estimate) and +3.2% in Narraweena (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Hurlstone Park, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Narraweena and 0.9% in Hurlstone Park, so landlords in Narraweena face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Narraweena is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,971 against 5,001, larger than Hurlstone Park; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Narraweena for rental income, Narraweena for a lower purchase price, Hurlstone Park for recent price momentum, Narraweena for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison
Hurlstone Park vs Narraweena: Suburb Comparison 2026