Hurstbridge vs The Basin
Property investment comparison - Hurstbridge, VIC 3099 vs The Basin, VIC 3154
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Hurstbridge wins 2, The Basin wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Hurstbridge | The Basin |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $950K | $950K |
| Median unit price | $400K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.31% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.29% | 3.33% |
| 1-year house growth | -6.0% | +3.1%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | +6.0% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.6% | 1.2% |
| Population | 3,554 | 4,497 |
Hurstbridge vs The Basin: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $950K in Hurstbridge and $950K in The Basin.
Over the past year house prices moved -6.0% in Hurstbridge and +3.1% in The Basin (an estimate), so recent momentum favours The Basin, while Hurstbridge went backwards.
Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Hurstbridge and 1.2% in The Basin, so landlords in Hurstbridge face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
The Basin is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,497 against 3,554, larger than Hurstbridge; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: The Basin for recent price momentum, Hurstbridge for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison