Skip to main content

Hurstville Grove vs North Epping

Property investment comparison - Hurstville Grove, NSW 2220 vs North Epping, NSW 2121

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Hurstville Grove wins 3, North Epping wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricHurstville GroveNorth Epping
Median house price$2.4M$2.4M
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)2.23%2.24%
Gross rental yield (units)3.08%2.81%
1-year house growth-4.1%-4.1%estimate
3-year house growth-1.9%-
Vacancy rate1.4%2.8%
Population2,6064,657

Hurstville Grove vs North Epping: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.4M in Hurstville Grove and $2.4M in North Epping, so Hurstville Grove is the cheaper entry point, with North Epping houses about 1% dearer.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 2.23% in Hurstville Grove and 2.24% in North Epping, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Over the past year house prices moved -4.1% in Hurstville Grove and -4.1% in North Epping (an estimate), so recent momentum favours North Epping, while Hurstville Grove went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Hurstville Grove and 2.8% in North Epping, so landlords in Hurstville Grove face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

North Epping is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,657 against 2,606, larger than Hurstville Grove; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Hurstville Grove for a lower purchase price, North Epping for recent price momentum, Hurstville Grove for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison