Skip to main content

Idalia vs Kawungan

Property investment comparison - Idalia, QLD 4811 vs Kawungan, QLD 4655

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Idalia wins 4, Kawungan wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricIdaliaKawungan
Median house price$830K$830K
Median unit price$450K-
Gross rental yield (houses)4.40%4.20%
Gross rental yield (units)6.00%4.11%
1-year house growth+15.1%+16.6%
3-year house growth+50.9%+35.2%
Vacancy rate1.2%2.4%
Population4,5635,460

Idalia vs Kawungan: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $830K in Idalia and $830K in Kawungan.

On cash flow, Idalia leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.40%, compared with 4.20% in Kawungan, a gap of 0.20 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +15.1% in Idalia and +16.6% in Kawungan, so recent momentum favours Kawungan, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Idalia houses are +50.9% and Kawungan houses +35.2%, so Idalia has compounded faster than Kawungan over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Idalia and 2.4% in Kawungan, so landlords in Idalia face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Kawungan is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,460 against 4,563, larger than Idalia; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Idalia for rental income, Kawungan for recent price momentum, Idalia for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison