Skip to main content

Idalia vs Sharon

Property investment comparison - Idalia, QLD 4811 vs Sharon, QLD 4670

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Idalia wins 2, Sharon wins 5. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricIdaliaSharon
Median house price$830K$825K
Median unit price$450K$445K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.40%4.70%
Gross rental yield (units)6.00%6.13%
1-year house growth+15.1%+14.8%
3-year house growth+50.9%+41.4%
Vacancy rate1.2%1.2%
Population4,5631,209

Idalia vs Sharon: what the numbers say

The median house price is $830K in Idalia and $825K in Sharon, so Sharon is the cheaper entry point, with Idalia houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Idalia sits at a median of $450K against $445K in Sharon, which makes Sharon the more affordable unit market and Idalia the pricier one.

On cash flow, Sharon leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.70%, compared with 4.40% in Idalia, a gap of 0.30 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +15.1% in Idalia and +14.8% in Sharon, so recent momentum favours Idalia, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Idalia houses are +50.9% and Sharon houses +41.4%, so Idalia has compounded faster than Sharon over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 1.2%.

Idalia is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,563 against 1,209, roughly 3.8 times the size of Sharon; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Sharon for rental income, Sharon for a lower purchase price, Idalia for recent price momentum. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison