Skip to main content

Idalia vs Urraween

Property investment comparison - Idalia, QLD 4811 vs Urraween, QLD 4655

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Idalia wins 5, Urraween wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricIdaliaUrraween
Median house price$830K$830K
Median unit price$450K$625K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.40%-
Gross rental yield (units)6.00%4.81%
1-year house growth+15.1%+12.3%
3-year house growth+50.9%+27.9%
Vacancy rate1.2%1.9%
Population4,5637,951

Idalia vs Urraween: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $830K in Idalia and $830K in Urraween.

For units, Idalia sits at a median of $450K against $625K in Urraween, which makes Idalia the more affordable unit market and Urraween the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +15.1% in Idalia and +12.3% in Urraween, so recent momentum favours Idalia, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Idalia houses are +50.9% and Urraween houses +27.9%, so Idalia has compounded faster than Urraween over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Idalia and 1.9% in Urraween, so landlords in Idalia face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Urraween is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,951 against 4,563, larger than Idalia; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Idalia for recent price momentum, Idalia for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison