Skip to main content

Illawong vs Point Frederick

Property investment comparison - Illawong, NSW 2234 vs Point Frederick, NSW 2250

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Illawong wins 2, Point Frederick wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricIllawongPoint Frederick
Median house price$2.0M$2.0M
Median unit price$1.2M$740K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.10%-
Gross rental yield (units)--
1-year house growth+7.8%-0.7%estimate
3-year house growth+20.3%-
Vacancy rate1.8%1.3%
Population7,4272,043

Illawong vs Point Frederick: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.0M in Illawong and $2.0M in Point Frederick, so Illawong is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Illawong sits at a median of $1.2M against $740K in Point Frederick, which makes Point Frederick the more affordable unit market and Illawong the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +7.8% in Illawong and -0.7% in Point Frederick (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Illawong, while Point Frederick went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 1.3% in Point Frederick and 1.8% in Illawong, so landlords in Point Frederick face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Illawong is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,427 against 2,043, roughly 3.6 times the size of Point Frederick; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Illawong for a lower purchase price, Illawong for recent price momentum, Point Frederick for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison