Skip to main content

Illowa vs Rosanna

Property investment comparison - Illowa, VIC 3282 vs Rosanna, VIC 3084

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Illowa wins 3, Rosanna wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricIllowaRosanna
Median house price$1.4M$1.4M
Median unit price$535K$815K
Gross rental yield (houses)1.51%2.40%
Gross rental yield (units)1.71%3.98%
1-year house growth--2.8%
3-year house growth-+11.7%
Vacancy rate0.7%1.6%
Population3048,616

Illowa vs Rosanna: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.4M in Illowa and $1.4M in Rosanna, so Illowa is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Illowa sits at a median of $535K against $815K in Rosanna, which makes Illowa the more affordable unit market and Rosanna the pricier one.

On cash flow, Rosanna leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.40%, compared with 1.51% in Illowa, a gap of 0.89 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Illowa and 1.6% in Rosanna, so landlords in Illowa face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Rosanna is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,616 against 304, roughly 28 times the size of Illowa; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Rosanna for rental income, Illowa for a lower purchase price, Illowa for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison