Innaloo vs Jindalee
Property investment comparison - Innaloo, WA 6018 vs Jindalee, WA 6036
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Innaloo wins 1, Jindalee wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Innaloo | Jindalee |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.1M | $1.1M |
| Median unit price | - | $1.3M |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 4.10% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.10% | 1.91% |
| 1-year house growth | +17.5%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.0% | 0.3% |
| Population | 9,592 | 4,044 |
Innaloo vs Jindalee: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.1M in Innaloo and $1.1M in Jindalee.
Rental vacancy is 0.3% in Jindalee and 1.0% in Innaloo, so landlords in Jindalee face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Innaloo is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,592 against 4,044, roughly 2.4 times the size of Jindalee; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Jindalee for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison