Skip to main content

Irrewillipe vs Maffra

Property investment comparison - Irrewillipe, VIC 3249 vs Maffra, VIC 3860

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Irrewillipe wins 2, Maffra wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricIrrewillipeMaffra
Median house price$495K$500K
Median unit price$470K$360K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.72%4.98%
Gross rental yield (units)5.17%-
1-year house growth-+12.5%
3-year house growth-+10.6%
Vacancy rate1.0%1.5%
Population1005,384

Irrewillipe vs Maffra: what the numbers say

The median house price is $495K in Irrewillipe and $500K in Maffra, so Irrewillipe is the cheaper entry point, with Maffra houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Irrewillipe sits at a median of $470K against $360K in Maffra, which makes Maffra the more affordable unit market and Irrewillipe the pricier one.

On cash flow, Maffra leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.98%, compared with 4.72% in Irrewillipe, a gap of 0.26 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Irrewillipe and 1.5% in Maffra, so landlords in Irrewillipe face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Maffra is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,384 against 100, roughly 54 times the size of Irrewillipe; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Maffra for rental income, Irrewillipe for a lower purchase price, Irrewillipe for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison