Skip to main content

Ivanhoe vs Ormond

Property investment comparison - Ivanhoe, VIC 3079 vs Ormond, VIC 3204

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Ivanhoe wins 4, Ormond wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricIvanhoeOrmond
Median house price$1.8M$1.8M
Median unit price$750K$720K
Gross rental yield (houses)-2.59%
Gross rental yield (units)4.15%4.06%
1-year house growth-2.9%-5.0%estimate
3-year house growth+12.1%-
Vacancy rate1.2%1.9%
Population13,3748,328

Ivanhoe vs Ormond: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.8M in Ivanhoe and $1.8M in Ormond, so Ivanhoe is the cheaper entry point, with Ormond houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Ivanhoe sits at a median of $750K against $720K in Ormond, which makes Ormond the more affordable unit market and Ivanhoe the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved -2.9% in Ivanhoe and -5.0% in Ormond (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Ivanhoe, while Ormond went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Ivanhoe and 1.9% in Ormond, so landlords in Ivanhoe face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Ivanhoe is the bigger suburb, with a population of 13,374 against 8,328, larger than Ormond; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Ivanhoe for a lower purchase price, Ivanhoe for recent price momentum, Ivanhoe for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison
Ivanhoe vs Ormond: Property Investment Comparison (2026)