Jane Brook vs Success
Property investment comparison - Jane Brook, WA 6056 vs Success, WA 6164
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Jane Brook wins 1, Success wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Jane Brook | Success |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1M | $1M |
| Median unit price | - | $600K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.22% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.25% | 5.18% |
| 1-year house growth | +16.4%estimate | +16.7% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +55.0% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.3% | 0.7% |
| Population | 3,670 | 11,340 |
Jane Brook vs Success: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1M in Jane Brook and $1M in Success.
Over the past year house prices moved +16.4% in Jane Brook (an estimate) and +16.7% in Success, so recent momentum favours Success, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Success and 1.3% in Jane Brook, so landlords in Success face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Success is the bigger suburb, with a population of 11,340 against 3,670, roughly 3.1 times the size of Jane Brook; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Success for recent price momentum, Success for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison