Skip to main content

Jannali vs Ultimo

Property investment comparison - Jannali, NSW 2226 vs Ultimo, NSW 2007

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Jannali wins 2, Ultimo wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricJannaliUltimo
Median house price$1.8M$1.7M
Median unit price$925K$705K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.01%3.17%
Gross rental yield (units)3.95%6.40%
1-year house growth+6.3%-8.9%estimate
3-year house growth+14.8%-
Vacancy rate0.7%1.6%
Population6,6327,410

Jannali vs Ultimo: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.8M in Jannali and $1.7M in Ultimo, so Ultimo is the cheaper entry point, with Jannali houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Jannali sits at a median of $925K against $705K in Ultimo, which makes Ultimo the more affordable unit market and Jannali the pricier one.

On cash flow, Ultimo leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.17%, compared with 3.01% in Jannali, a gap of 0.16 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +6.3% in Jannali and -8.9% in Ultimo (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Jannali, while Ultimo went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Jannali and 1.6% in Ultimo, so landlords in Jannali face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Ultimo is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,410 against 6,632, larger than Jannali; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Ultimo for rental income, Ultimo for a lower purchase price, Jannali for recent price momentum, Jannali for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison