Jetsonville vs Old Beach
Property investment comparison - Jetsonville, TAS 7260 vs Old Beach, TAS 7017
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Jetsonville wins 1, Old Beach wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Jetsonville | Old Beach |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $735K | $730K |
| Median unit price | - | $565K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.22% | 4.41% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 4.94% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +2.1% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +1.4% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.2% | 3.5% |
| Population | 147 | 4,394 |
Jetsonville vs Old Beach: what the numbers say
The median house price is $735K in Jetsonville and $730K in Old Beach, so Old Beach is the cheaper entry point, with Jetsonville houses about 1% dearer.
On cash flow, Old Beach leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.41%, compared with 3.22% in Jetsonville, a gap of 1.19 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Jetsonville and 3.5% in Old Beach, so landlords in Jetsonville face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Old Beach is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,394 against 147, roughly 30 times the size of Jetsonville; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Old Beach for rental income, Old Beach for a lower purchase price, Jetsonville for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison