Jetsonville vs Ranelagh
Property investment comparison - Jetsonville, TAS 7260 vs Ranelagh, TAS 7109
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Jetsonville wins 1, Ranelagh wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Jetsonville | Ranelagh |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $735K | $730K |
| Median unit price | - | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.22% | 3.61% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 4.10% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +7.6%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.2% | 1.4% |
| Population | 147 | 1,484 |
Jetsonville vs Ranelagh: what the numbers say
The median house price is $735K in Jetsonville and $730K in Ranelagh, so Ranelagh is the cheaper entry point, with Jetsonville houses about 1% dearer.
On cash flow, Ranelagh leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.61%, compared with 3.22% in Jetsonville, a gap of 0.39 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Jetsonville and 1.4% in Ranelagh, so landlords in Jetsonville face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Ranelagh is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,484 against 147, roughly 10 times the size of Jetsonville; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Ranelagh for rental income, Ranelagh for a lower purchase price, Jetsonville for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison