Jiggi vs Queanbeyan
Property investment comparison - Jiggi, NSW 2480 vs Queanbeyan, NSW 2620
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Jiggi wins 1, Queanbeyan wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Jiggi | Queanbeyan |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $875K | $875K |
| Median unit price | $450K | $450K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.30% | 4.05% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.30% | - |
| 1-year house growth | - | +1.2%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.5% | 1.7% |
| Population | 370 | 6,409 |
Jiggi vs Queanbeyan: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $875K in Jiggi and $875K in Queanbeyan.
On cash flow, Queanbeyan leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.05%, compared with 2.30% in Jiggi, a gap of 1.75 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Jiggi and 1.7% in Queanbeyan, so landlords in Jiggi face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Queanbeyan is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,409 against 370, roughly 17 times the size of Jiggi; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Queanbeyan for rental income, Jiggi for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison