Jumbuk vs Portarlington
Property investment comparison - Jumbuk, VIC 3869 vs Portarlington, VIC 3223
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Jumbuk wins 1, Portarlington wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Jumbuk | Portarlington |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $825K | $825K |
| Median unit price | - | $630K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 3.50% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 3.80% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +3.6%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.1% | 2.1% |
| Population | 42 | 4,436 |
Jumbuk vs Portarlington: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $825K in Jumbuk and $825K in Portarlington.
Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Jumbuk and 2.1% in Portarlington, so landlords in Jumbuk face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Portarlington is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,436 against 42, roughly 106 times the size of Jumbuk; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Jumbuk for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison