Skip to main content

Junee vs Yenda

Property investment comparison - Junee, NSW 2663 vs Yenda, NSW 2681

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Junee wins 3, Yenda wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricJuneeYenda
Median house price$495K$490K
Median unit price-$355K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.41%4.67%
Gross rental yield (units)4.75%2.08%
1-year house growth+10.4%+2.7%estimate
3-year house growth+27.7%-
Vacancy rate1.5%2.0%
Population5,0661,564

Junee vs Yenda: what the numbers say

The median house price is $495K in Junee and $490K in Yenda, so Yenda is the cheaper entry point, with Junee houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Yenda leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.67%, compared with 4.41% in Junee, a gap of 0.26 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +10.4% in Junee and +2.7% in Yenda (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Junee, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.5% in Junee and 2.0% in Yenda, so landlords in Junee face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Junee is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,066 against 1,564, roughly 3.2 times the size of Yenda; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Yenda for rental income, Yenda for a lower purchase price, Junee for recent price momentum, Junee for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison