Skip to main content

Kahibah vs Mangerton

Property investment comparison - Kahibah, NSW 2290 vs Mangerton, NSW 2500

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Kahibah wins 1, Mangerton wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricKahibahMangerton
Median house price$1.3M$1.3M
Median unit price$870K$580K
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.30%
Gross rental yield (units)--
1-year house growth+13.2%+2.2%estimate
3-year house growth+26.5%-
Vacancy rate0.8%0.8%
Population2,6032,862

Kahibah vs Mangerton: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.3M in Kahibah and $1.3M in Mangerton.

For units, Kahibah sits at a median of $870K against $580K in Mangerton, which makes Mangerton the more affordable unit market and Kahibah the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +13.2% in Kahibah and +2.2% in Mangerton (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Kahibah, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Mangerton and 0.8% in Kahibah, so landlords in Mangerton face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Mangerton is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,862 against 2,603, larger than Kahibah; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Kahibah for recent price momentum, Mangerton for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison