Kalgup vs Scarborough
Property investment comparison - Kalgup, WA 6280 vs Scarborough, WA 6019
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Kalgup wins 3, Scarborough wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Kalgup | Scarborough |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.5M | $1.4M |
| Median unit price | $575K | $840K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 3.59% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 6.79% | 5.00% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +14.8%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.7% | 1.5% |
| Population | 91 | 17,605 |
Kalgup vs Scarborough: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.5M in Kalgup and $1.4M in Scarborough, so Scarborough is the cheaper entry point, with Kalgup houses about 1% dearer.
For units, Kalgup sits at a median of $575K against $840K in Scarborough, which makes Kalgup the more affordable unit market and Scarborough the pricier one.
Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Kalgup and 1.5% in Scarborough, so landlords in Kalgup face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Scarborough is the bigger suburb, with a population of 17,605 against 91, roughly 193 times the size of Kalgup; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Scarborough for a lower purchase price, Kalgup for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison