Skip to main content

Kalimna vs Mirboo North

Property investment comparison - Kalimna, VIC 3909 vs Mirboo North, VIC 3871

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Kalimna wins 3, Mirboo North wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricKalimnaMirboo North
Median house price$560K$565K
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)4.56%4.40%
Gross rental yield (units)5.30%-
1-year house growth+4.9%+1.2%estimate
3-year house growth+20.5%-
Vacancy rate1.5%0.6%
Population1,3502,263

Kalimna vs Mirboo North: what the numbers say

The median house price is $560K in Kalimna and $565K in Mirboo North, so Kalimna is the cheaper entry point, with Mirboo North houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Kalimna leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.56%, compared with 4.40% in Mirboo North, a gap of 0.16 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +4.9% in Kalimna and +1.2% in Mirboo North (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Kalimna, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Mirboo North and 1.5% in Kalimna, so landlords in Mirboo North face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Mirboo North is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,263 against 1,350, larger than Kalimna; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Kalimna for rental income, Kalimna for a lower purchase price, Kalimna for recent price momentum, Mirboo North for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison