Skip to main content

Kalimna vs Paynesville

Property investment comparison - Kalimna, VIC 3909 vs Paynesville, VIC 3880

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Kalimna wins 4, Paynesville wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricKalimnaPaynesville
Median house price$560K$560K
Median unit price-$430K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.56%4.58%
Gross rental yield (units)5.30%4.95%
1-year house growth+4.9%+4.0%
3-year house growth+20.5%+5.3%
Vacancy rate1.5%2.3%
Population1,3503,636

Kalimna vs Paynesville: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $560K in Kalimna and $560K in Paynesville.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 4.56% in Kalimna and 4.58% in Paynesville, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Over the past year house prices moved +4.9% in Kalimna and +4.0% in Paynesville, so recent momentum favours Kalimna, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Kalimna houses are +20.5% and Paynesville houses +5.3%, so Kalimna has compounded faster than Paynesville over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.5% in Kalimna and 2.3% in Paynesville, so landlords in Kalimna face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Paynesville is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,636 against 1,350, roughly 2.7 times the size of Kalimna; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Kalimna for recent price momentum, Kalimna for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison