Kalimna vs Runnymede
Property investment comparison - Kalimna, VIC 3909 vs Runnymede, VIC 3558
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Kalimna wins 1, Runnymede wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Kalimna | Runnymede |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $560K | $560K |
| Median unit price | - | $355K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.56% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.30% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +4.9% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +20.5% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.5% | 1.5% |
| Population | 1,350 | 64 |
Kalimna vs Runnymede: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $560K in Kalimna and $560K in Runnymede.
Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 1.5%.
Kalimna is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,350 against 64, roughly 21 times the size of Runnymede; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison