Skip to main content

Kalkie vs Yeppoon

Property investment comparison - Kalkie, QLD 4670 vs Yeppoon, QLD 4703

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Kalkie wins 3, Yeppoon wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricKalkieYeppoon
Median house price$800K$800K
Median unit price-$580K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.30%4.28%
Gross rental yield (units)4.90%-
1-year house growth+13.2%estimate+11.3%
3-year house growth-+35.5%
Vacancy rate0.9%1.3%
Population2,9687,037

Kalkie vs Yeppoon: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $800K in Kalkie and $800K in Yeppoon.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 4.30% in Kalkie and 4.28% in Yeppoon, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Over the past year house prices moved +13.2% in Kalkie (an estimate) and +11.3% in Yeppoon, so recent momentum favours Kalkie, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Kalkie and 1.3% in Yeppoon, so landlords in Kalkie face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Yeppoon is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,037 against 2,968, roughly 2.4 times the size of Kalkie; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Kalkie for recent price momentum, Kalkie for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison