Skip to main content

Kallangur vs Nirimba

Property investment comparison - Kallangur, QLD 4503 vs Nirimba, QLD 4551

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Kallangur wins 3, Nirimba wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricKallangurNirimba
Median house price$920K$920K
Median unit price$720K-
Gross rental yield (houses)-4.20%
Gross rental yield (units)--
1-year house growth+18.0%+13.9%
3-year house growth+47.9%+31.8%
Vacancy rate0.8%1.1%
Population21,7612,229

Kallangur vs Nirimba: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $920K in Kallangur and $920K in Nirimba.

Over the past year house prices moved +18.0% in Kallangur and +13.9% in Nirimba, so recent momentum favours Kallangur, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Kallangur houses are +47.9% and Nirimba houses +31.8%, so Kallangur has compounded faster than Nirimba over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Kallangur and 1.1% in Nirimba, so landlords in Kallangur face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Kallangur is the bigger suburb, with a population of 21,761 against 2,229, roughly 10 times the size of Nirimba; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Kallangur for recent price momentum, Kallangur for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison