Skip to main content

Kamarooka vs Laverton

Property investment comparison - Kamarooka, VIC 3570 vs Laverton, VIC 3028

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Kamarooka wins 3, Laverton wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricKamarookaLaverton
Median house price$625K$625K
Median unit price$525K$575K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.39%3.90%
Gross rental yield (units)2.32%4.99%
1-year house growth-+4.5%
3-year house growth-+6.4%
Vacancy rate1.2%2.2%
Population894,760

Kamarooka vs Laverton: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $625K in Kamarooka and $625K in Laverton.

For units, Kamarooka sits at a median of $525K against $575K in Laverton, which makes Kamarooka the more affordable unit market and Laverton the pricier one.

On cash flow, Kamarooka leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.39%, compared with 3.90% in Laverton, a gap of 0.49 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Kamarooka and 2.2% in Laverton, so landlords in Kamarooka face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Laverton is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,760 against 89, roughly 53 times the size of Kamarooka; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Kamarooka for rental income, Kamarooka for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison