Skip to main content

Kangaroo Flat vs Thomson

Property investment comparison - Kangaroo Flat, VIC 3555 vs Thomson, VIC 3219

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Kangaroo Flat wins 3, Thomson wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricKangaroo FlatThomson
Median house price$610K$610K
Median unit price$415K$520K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.59%4.05%
Gross rental yield (units)5.16%4.25%
1-year house growth+11.5%+12.0%estimate
3-year house growth+20.0%-
Vacancy rate1.3%0.8%
Population11,3281,606

Kangaroo Flat vs Thomson: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $610K in Kangaroo Flat and $610K in Thomson.

For units, Kangaroo Flat sits at a median of $415K against $520K in Thomson, which makes Kangaroo Flat the more affordable unit market and Thomson the pricier one.

On cash flow, Kangaroo Flat leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.59%, compared with 4.05% in Thomson, a gap of 0.54 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +11.5% in Kangaroo Flat and +12.0% in Thomson (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Thomson, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Thomson and 1.3% in Kangaroo Flat, so landlords in Thomson face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Kangaroo Flat is the bigger suburb, with a population of 11,328 against 1,606, roughly 7 times the size of Thomson; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Kangaroo Flat for rental income, Thomson for recent price momentum, Thomson for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison