Skip to main content

Kangaroo Point vs Yaroomba

Property investment comparison - Kangaroo Point, QLD 4169 vs Yaroomba, QLD 4573

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Kangaroo Point wins 2, Yaroomba wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricKangaroo PointYaroomba
Median house price$1.8M$1.8M
Median unit price$890K-
Gross rental yield (houses)2.46%-
Gross rental yield (units)-3.83%
1-year house growth+2.6%+11.2%
3-year house growth+35.8%+20.6%
Vacancy rate1.1%1.2%
Population9,6892,043

Kangaroo Point vs Yaroomba: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.8M in Kangaroo Point and $1.8M in Yaroomba, so Yaroomba is the cheaper entry point, with Kangaroo Point houses about 1% dearer.

Over the past year house prices moved +2.6% in Kangaroo Point and +11.2% in Yaroomba, so recent momentum favours Yaroomba, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Kangaroo Point houses are +35.8% and Yaroomba houses +20.6%, so Kangaroo Point has compounded faster than Yaroomba over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Kangaroo Point and 1.2% in Yaroomba, so landlords in Kangaroo Point face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Kangaroo Point is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,689 against 2,043, roughly 4.7 times the size of Yaroomba; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Yaroomba for a lower purchase price, Yaroomba for recent price momentum, Kangaroo Point for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison