Skip to main content

Kangaroo Valley vs Terara

Property investment comparison - Kangaroo Valley, NSW 2577 vs Terara, NSW 2540

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Kangaroo Valley wins 5, Terara wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricKangaroo ValleyTerara
Median house price$1.7M$1.7M
Median unit price$440K$625K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.08%1.88%
Gross rental yield (units)8.21%4.20%
1-year house growth+16.5%-
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.0%2.4%
Population856305

Kangaroo Valley vs Terara: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.7M in Kangaroo Valley and $1.7M in Terara, so Kangaroo Valley is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Kangaroo Valley sits at a median of $440K against $625K in Terara, which makes Kangaroo Valley the more affordable unit market and Terara the pricier one.

On cash flow, Kangaroo Valley leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.08%, compared with 1.88% in Terara, a gap of 0.20 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Kangaroo Valley and 2.4% in Terara, so landlords in Kangaroo Valley face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Kangaroo Valley is the bigger suburb, with a population of 856 against 305, roughly 2.8 times the size of Terara; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Kangaroo Valley for rental income, Kangaroo Valley for a lower purchase price, Kangaroo Valley for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison