Skip to main content

Karabar vs Worrigee

Property investment comparison - Karabar, NSW 2620 vs Worrigee, NSW 2540

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Karabar wins 1, Worrigee wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricKarabarWorrigee
Median house price$845K$845K
Median unit price$630K-
Gross rental yield (houses)4.18%3.92%
Gross rental yield (units)4.37%4.50%
1-year house growth+5.1%+9.5%
3-year house growth+12.7%+18.9%
Vacancy rate1.9%1.4%
Population8,5175,384

Karabar vs Worrigee: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $845K in Karabar and $845K in Worrigee.

On cash flow, Karabar leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.18%, compared with 3.92% in Worrigee, a gap of 0.26 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +5.1% in Karabar and +9.5% in Worrigee, so recent momentum favours Worrigee, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Karabar houses are +12.7% and Worrigee houses +18.9%, so Worrigee has compounded faster than Karabar over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Worrigee and 1.9% in Karabar, so landlords in Worrigee face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Karabar is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,517 against 5,384, larger than Worrigee; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Karabar for rental income, Worrigee for recent price momentum, Worrigee for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison