Kardinya vs Kingsley
Property investment comparison - Kardinya, WA 6163 vs Kingsley, WA 6026
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Kardinya wins 1, Kingsley wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Kardinya | Kingsley |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.3M | $1.3M |
| Median unit price | $760K | $510K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.26% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.78% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +22.0% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +69.5% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.2% | 0.5% |
| Population | 9,137 | 13,204 |
Kardinya vs Kingsley: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.3M in Kardinya and $1.3M in Kingsley, so Kardinya is the cheaper entry point, with Kingsley houses about 1% dearer.
For units, Kardinya sits at a median of $760K against $510K in Kingsley, which makes Kingsley the more affordable unit market and Kardinya the pricier one.
Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Kingsley and 1.2% in Kardinya, so landlords in Kingsley face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Kingsley is the bigger suburb, with a population of 13,204 against 9,137, larger than Kardinya; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Kardinya for a lower purchase price, Kingsley for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison