Karuah vs Oakhampton
Property investment comparison - Karuah, NSW 2324 vs Oakhampton, NSW 2320
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Karuah wins 1, Oakhampton wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Karuah | Oakhampton |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $740K | $740K |
| Median unit price | - | $525K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.92% | 4.55% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.96% | 5.84% |
| 1-year house growth | +9.9% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +68.3% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.2% | 1.7% |
| Population | 1,618 | 165 |
Karuah vs Oakhampton: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $740K in Karuah and $740K in Oakhampton.
On cash flow, Oakhampton leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.55%, compared with 3.92% in Karuah, a gap of 0.63 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Karuah and 1.7% in Oakhampton, so landlords in Karuah face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Karuah is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,618 against 165, roughly 10 times the size of Oakhampton; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Oakhampton for rental income, Karuah for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison