Kawana Island vs Stretton
Property investment comparison - Kawana Island, QLD 4575 vs Stretton, QLD 4116
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Kawana Island wins 3, Stretton wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Kawana Island | Stretton |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $2.0M | $2.0M |
| Median unit price | $1.1M | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.77% | 2.55% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.29% | 4.42% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +14.4% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +60.0% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.8% | 1.9% |
| Population | - | 4,686 |
Kawana Island vs Stretton: what the numbers say
The median house price is $2.0M in Kawana Island and $2.0M in Stretton, so Kawana Island is the cheaper entry point, with Stretton houses about 1% dearer.
On cash flow, Kawana Island leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.77%, compared with 2.55% in Stretton, a gap of 0.22 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 1.8%.
In short: Kawana Island for rental income, Kawana Island for a lower purchase price. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison