Skip to main content

Kawana vs South Mackay

Property investment comparison - Kawana, QLD 4701 vs South Mackay, QLD 4740

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Kawana wins 2, South Mackay wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricKawanaSouth Mackay
Median house price$650K$650K
Median unit price-$445K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.76%5.49%
Gross rental yield (units)-6.18%
1-year house growth+17.9%+18.2%
3-year house growth+76.9%+62.0%
Vacancy rate0.7%1.1%
Population4,4346,918

Kawana vs South Mackay: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $650K in Kawana and $650K in South Mackay.

On cash flow, South Mackay leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.49%, compared with 4.76% in Kawana, a gap of 0.73 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +17.9% in Kawana and +18.2% in South Mackay, so recent momentum favours South Mackay, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Kawana houses are +76.9% and South Mackay houses +62.0%, so Kawana has compounded faster than South Mackay over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Kawana and 1.1% in South Mackay, so landlords in Kawana face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

South Mackay is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,918 against 4,434, larger than Kawana; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: South Mackay for rental income, South Mackay for recent price momentum, Kawana for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison