Skip to main content

Kawungan vs Urraween

Property investment comparison - Kawungan, QLD 4655 vs Urraween, QLD 4655

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Kawungan wins 2, Urraween wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricKawunganUrraween
Median house price$830K$830K
Median unit price-$625K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.20%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.11%4.81%
1-year house growth+16.6%+12.3%
3-year house growth+35.2%+27.9%
Vacancy rate2.4%1.9%
Population5,4607,951

Kawungan vs Urraween: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $830K in Kawungan and $830K in Urraween.

Over the past year house prices moved +16.6% in Kawungan and +12.3% in Urraween, so recent momentum favours Kawungan, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Kawungan houses are +35.2% and Urraween houses +27.9%, so Kawungan has compounded faster than Urraween over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.9% in Urraween and 2.4% in Kawungan, so landlords in Urraween face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Urraween is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,951 against 5,460, larger than Kawungan; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Kawungan for recent price momentum, Urraween for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison