Kayena vs Spreyton
Property investment comparison - Kayena, TAS 7270 vs Spreyton, TAS 7310
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Kayena wins 1, Spreyton wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Kayena | Spreyton |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $750K | $755K |
| Median unit price | $660K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 3.99% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.00% | 3.67% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +11.8% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +25.8% |
| Vacancy rate | 2.0% | 0.4% |
| Population | 221 | 1,876 |
Kayena vs Spreyton: what the numbers say
The median house price is $750K in Kayena and $755K in Spreyton, so Kayena is the cheaper entry point, with Spreyton houses about 1% dearer.
Rental vacancy is 0.4% in Spreyton and 2.0% in Kayena, so landlords in Spreyton face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Spreyton is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,876 against 221, roughly 8 times the size of Kayena; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Kayena for a lower purchase price, Spreyton for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison