Kealba vs Quantong
Property investment comparison - Kealba, VIC 3021 vs Quantong, VIC 3401
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Kealba wins 2, Quantong wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Kealba | Quantong |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $775K | $770K |
| Median unit price | - | $530K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.70% | 2.59% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.70% | 3.42% |
| 1-year house growth | +7.3%estimate | +19.8% |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.3% | - |
| Population | 3,226 | 354 |
Kealba vs Quantong: what the numbers say
The median house price is $775K in Kealba and $770K in Quantong, so Quantong is the cheaper entry point, with Kealba houses about 1% dearer.
On cash flow, Kealba leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.70%, compared with 2.59% in Quantong, a gap of 1.11 percentage points.
Over the past year house prices moved +7.3% in Kealba (an estimate) and +19.8% in Quantong, so recent momentum favours Quantong, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Kealba is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,226 against 354, roughly 9 times the size of Quantong; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Kealba for rental income, Quantong for a lower purchase price, Quantong for recent price momentum. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison