Skip to main content

Kearsley vs Turvey Park

Property investment comparison - Kearsley, NSW 2325 vs Turvey Park, NSW 2650

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Kearsley wins 2, Turvey Park wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricKearsleyTurvey Park
Median house price$780K$780K
Median unit price$470K-
Gross rental yield (houses)4.27%3.98%
Gross rental yield (units)5.35%3.54%
1-year house growth+11.4%+15.6%estimate
3-year house growth+36.6%-
Vacancy rate2.0%1.1%
Population8383,572

Kearsley vs Turvey Park: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $780K in Kearsley and $780K in Turvey Park.

On cash flow, Kearsley leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.27%, compared with 3.98% in Turvey Park, a gap of 0.29 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +11.4% in Kearsley and +15.6% in Turvey Park (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Turvey Park, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Turvey Park and 2.0% in Kearsley, so landlords in Turvey Park face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Turvey Park is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,572 against 838, roughly 4.3 times the size of Kearsley; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Kearsley for rental income, Turvey Park for recent price momentum, Turvey Park for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison