Skip to main content

Keilor Downs vs Skye

Property investment comparison - Keilor Downs, VIC 3038 vs Skye, VIC 3977

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Keilor Downs wins 0, Skye wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricKeilor DownsSkye
Median house price$860K$860K
Median unit price$630K$630K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.33%3.99%
Gross rental yield (units)-4.57%
1-year house growth+4.3%estimate+8.2%
3-year house growth-+13.2%
Vacancy rate1.4%1.0%
Population9,8578,088

Keilor Downs vs Skye: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $860K in Keilor Downs and $860K in Skye.

On cash flow, Skye leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.99%, compared with 3.33% in Keilor Downs, a gap of 0.66 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +4.3% in Keilor Downs (an estimate) and +8.2% in Skye, so recent momentum favours Skye, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Skye and 1.4% in Keilor Downs, so landlords in Skye face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Keilor Downs is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,857 against 8,088, larger than Skye; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Skye for rental income, Skye for recent price momentum, Skye for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison