Skip to main content

Keilor East vs Pascoe Vale

Property investment comparison - Keilor East, VIC 3033 vs Pascoe Vale, VIC 3044

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Keilor East wins 4, Pascoe Vale wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricKeilor EastPascoe Vale
Median house price$1.1M$1.2M
Median unit price$710K$690K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.84%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.30%4.24%
1-year house growth+10.8%-0.1%estimate
3-year house growth+15.4%-
Vacancy rate0.8%2.0%
Population15,07818,171

Keilor East vs Pascoe Vale: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.1M in Keilor East and $1.2M in Pascoe Vale, so Keilor East is the cheaper entry point, with Pascoe Vale houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Keilor East sits at a median of $710K against $690K in Pascoe Vale, which makes Pascoe Vale the more affordable unit market and Keilor East the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +10.8% in Keilor East and -0.1% in Pascoe Vale (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Keilor East, while Pascoe Vale went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Keilor East and 2.0% in Pascoe Vale, so landlords in Keilor East face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Pascoe Vale is the bigger suburb, with a population of 18,171 against 15,078, larger than Keilor East; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Keilor East for a lower purchase price, Keilor East for recent price momentum, Keilor East for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison